.
One of the key provisions of the Affordable Care Act, the new health
reform law, gives money to states to expand Medicaid to adults and
families with low incomes – a total of about 17 million additional
people.
However, the Supreme Court recently ruled that the federal
government cannot effectively coerce states into accepting the Medicaid
expansion by withdrawing all a state’s Medicaid funds if it refuses.
Although elderly and disabled individuals who currently receive Medicaid
aren't affected by the Court's ruling, it could leave millions of
others without any options for health coverage -- and possibly cost
lives.
The Affordable Care Act expands Medicaid eligibility starting in 2014
to individuals and families with incomes up to 133 percent of
the poverty line, which is $14,856 for an individual in 2012. (Most
states currently limit Medicaid to certain categories of people at or
below the poverty line, including children, pregnant women, parents of
eligible children, people with disabilities and elderly needing
long-term care.)
The federal government will pay the complete cost for
the Medicaid expansion for three years for newly eligible beneficiaries,
and 90 percent of a state’s costs thereafter.
Nevertheless, the governors of several states, including Texas,
Louisiana, and Florida, have said they will not accept federal money in
order to expand coverage. Although politics is undoubtedly playing a
role in these pronouncements, some are worried about the costs
associated with expanding Medicaid, despite the federal money.
On the
other hand, some analysts
predict that expanding Medicaid could actually lead to savings, in part
because uninsured individuals already cost states billions of dollars. Arkansas officials estimated the expansion would save the state $372 million in the first six years. Another recent study found that when states have expanded their Medicaid programs in the past, fewer people have died.
If a state opts out of the expansion, then adults who earn too much
to qualify for Medicaid but too little to qualify for tax subsidies to
pay for private health insurance will be left without coverage. People
in those states who earn less than 100 percent of the federal poverty
limit ($11,170 for an individual) and are not eligible for Medicaid
benefits would also not be eligible for tax credits to purchase
otherwise unaffordable private insurance. If the state chooses to expand
Medicaid, those people would be covered. For more information on this
looming coverage gap, click here.
For more information about the debate taking place in states about whether to opt out of the health care expansion, click here and here.
For a Kaiser Commission brief titled "How will the Medicaid Expansion
for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage?," which includes
a state-by-state breakdown of current Medicaid eligibility, click here.
Reprinted with the permission of ElderLawAnswers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This blog is truly awesome in all aspects.
ReplyDeleteInjury lawyer
Utah injury lawyer
Spanish Fork Lawyer