Showing posts with label elder law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elder law. Show all posts

Friday, July 12, 2013

Bankruptcy Trustee Is Entitled to Funds Transferred in Order to Qualify for Medicaid


The following article serves as a warning about do-it-yourself estate planning.  An effective technique of protecting assets from nursing homes and long term care expenses is to transfer those assets to an adult child. However, the assets can be lost to that child's own creditors.

I always recommend that my clients transfer assets to a trust instead of a child so that the money is protected from both the parent's and child's creditors.

The following article is courtesy of ElderLawAnswers.com:

A woman who transferred funds to her daughter to qualify for Medicaid cannot claim that she retained ownership of the funds when her daughter declares bankruptcy, according to a U.S. bankruptcy court. In Re Woodworth (Bankr. E.D. Va., No. 11-11051-BFK, Feb. 6, 2013).

In 2002, Dorothy Stutesman transferred $142,742 to her daughter, Holly Woodworth, so that she would not have assets in her name if she ever needed Medicaid. In April 2010, Ms. Woodworth transferred the money to a trust designed to protect the assets from creditors. The entire corpus of the trust was used to purchase an annuity to benefit Ms. Woodworth. In February 2011, Ms. Woodworth filed for bankruptcy.
The bankruptcy trustee sought to void the trust, arguing it was a fraudulent transfer under bankruptcy code. Ms. Woodworth did not dispute that the transfer was fraudulent, but she argued that the property was never part of her estate because she was holding it in trust for her mother.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia enters judgment for the bankruptcy trustee, holding that Ms. Woodworth clearly had complete ownership of the funds. According to the court, "Ms. Stutesman can't have it both ways—she can't part with title for purposes of Medicaid eligibility, and at the same time claim that she retained an equitable title to the asset. To allow this kind of secret reservation of equitable title would be to sanction Medicaid fraud."

For the full text of this decision, click here.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Economists Say That Tightening Medicaid Rules Would Barely Increase Demand for Private Insurance

It is sometimes claimed that reducing the amount of assets an individual can keep while qualifying for Medicaid would increase the purchase of private long-term care insurance coverage.  

Now, two professors of economics have estimated that tightening Medicaid asset rules would do little to encourage the purchase of long-term care insurance policies.  

Although Medicaid recipients may keep only about $2,000 in assets in most states, their spouses may retain between $22,728 and $113,640, depending on their particular state.  The minimum and maximum are determined by federal law but individual states’ limits may set their own limits within these parameters.  

In an article published in the Fall 2011 issue of the Journal of Economic Perspectives, Jeffrey R. Brown of the University of Illinois and Amy Finkelstein of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology estimate that a $10,000 decrease in the level of assets an individual and their spouse can keep while qualifying for Medicaid would increase private long-term care insurance coverage by 1.1 percentage points.

“To put this in perspective,” they write, “if every state in the country moved from their current Medicaid asset eligibility requirements to the most stringent Medicaid eligibility requirements allowed by federal law, this would decrease average household assets protected from Medicaid by about $25,000. This, in turn, would increase the demand for private long-term care insurance by only 2.7 percentage points. While this represents a large increase in insurance coverage relative to the baseline ownership rate, the vast majority of households would still find it unattractive to purchase private insurance.”

Overall, Brown and Finkelstein are pessimistic about the prospects for encouraging more Americans to buy long-term care insurance unless Medicaid is completely restructured or done away with altogether.  They note that long-term care insurance is a poor deal, particularly for men, who get back only about 33 cents on the premium dollar they spend, and that for a 65-year-old man of average wealth, 60 percent of the private insurance benefits would have been paid by Medicaid.   

But the authors say that even if the implicit Medicaid “tax” on long-term care insurance were eliminated, “other factors could still prevent the market for long-term care insurance from developing.”  These factors include the availability of informal insurance provided by family members, the liquid assets in the home serving as a “buffer stock of assets,” and the difficulty many individuals have in “making decisions about long-term, probabilistic outcomes.”

To read the article, “Insuring Long-Term Care in the United States,” click here.
For a commentary on the article in Forbes magazine, click here.
For more on Medicaid's rules, click here.

This article was reprinted with the permission of ElderLawAnswers.com.

Monday, October 31, 2011

IRS Issues Long-Term Care Premium Deductibility Limits for 2012

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is increasing the amount taxpayers can deduct from their 2012 taxes as a result of buying long-term care insurance.

Premiums for "qualified" long-term care insurance policies (see explanation below) are tax deductible to the extent that they, along with other unreimbursed medical expenses (including Medicare premiums), exceed 7.5 percent of the insured's adjusted gross income.

These premiums -- what the policyholder pays the insurance company to keep the policy in force -- are deductible for the taxpayer, his or her spouse and other dependents. (If you are self-employed, the tax-deductibility rules are a little different: You can take the amount of the premium as a deduction as long as you made a net profit; your medical expenses do not have to exceed 7.5 percent of your income.)

However, there is a limit on how large a premium can be deducted, depending on the age of the taxpayer at the end of the year. Following are the deductibility limits for 2012. Any premium amounts for the year above these limits are not considered to be a medical expense.

Attained age before the close of the taxable year
Maximum deduction for year
40 or less
$350
More than 40 but not more than 50
$660
More than 50 but not more than 60
$1,310
More than 60 but not more than 70
$3,500
More than 70
$4,370


What Is a "Qualified" Policy?
To be "qualified," policies issued on or after January 1, 1997, must adhere to certain requirements, among them that the policy must offer the consumer the options of "inflation" and "nonforfeiture" protection, although the consumer can choose not to purchase these features. Policies purchased before January 1, 1997, will be grandfathered and treated as "qualified" as long as they have been approved by the insurance commissioner of the state in which they are sold. For more on the "qualified" definition, click here.

The Georgetown University Long-Term Care Financing Project has a two-page fact sheet, "Tax Code Treatment of Long-Term Care and Long-Term Care Insurance."

To download it in PDF format, go to: http://ltc.georgetown.edu/pdfs/taxcode.pdf

This article is reprinted with the permission of ElderLawAnswers.com.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Adult Children Losing $3 Trillion in Caring for Aging Parents

Americans who take time off work to care for their aging parents are losing an estimated $3 trillion dollars in wages, pension and Social Security benefits, according to a new MetLife study. Meanwhile, the percentage of adult children providing basic care for their parents has skyrocketed in recent years. 

Nearly 10 million adults age 50 and over care for an aging parent, MetLife says. For the individual female caregiver, the cost impact of caregiving in terms of lost wages, pension and Social Security benefits averages $324,044. For male caregivers, the figure is $283,716. 

The study also identified a dramatic rise in the share of men and women providing basic parental care over the past decade and a half. In 1994, only 9 percent of women and 3 percent of men and were providing care. By 2008, the percentage of women caregivers had more than tripled to 28 percent, while the figure for men had quintupled to 17 percent. "Basic care" is defined as help with personal activities like dressing, feeding, and bathing. Daughters are more likely to provide basic care and sons are more likely to provide financial assistance, the study found. 

"Undoubtedly, the impact of the aging population has resulted in increased need within families for family caregiving support," the study notes. 

At the same time, MetLife found that adult children age 50 and over who work and provide care to a parent are more likely to have fair or poor health than those who do not provide care to their parents. 

The study was based on an analysis of data from the 2008 National Health and Retirement Study (HRS). 

The findings have implications for individuals, employers and policymakers, MetLife says. Individuals, it says, should consider their own health when caregiving and should prepare financially for their own retirement. Employers can provide retirement planning and stress management information and assist employees with accommodations like flex-time and family leave. 

On the policy side, although only a few states mandate paid family and medical leave, "clearly this policy would benefit working caregivers who need to take leave to care for an aging parent," the study concludes. MetLife also notes that the CLASS Act, a voluntary long-term care insurance program that is part of the new federal health reform law, will provide some coverage for long-term care needs as well as raise public awareness of the issue. 

For more on the study, "The MetLife Study of Caregiving Costs to Working Caregivers: Double Jeopardy for Baby Boomers Caring for Their Parents," click here.

Reprinted with permission by ElderLawAnswers.com

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Currently on The Swinton Law Firm Radio: A Case of Neglect

Barbara Salerno and her family thought their decision to send their 80-year-old father, Albert Salerno, to a nursing home would mean he would be safe and cared for--but they were wrong. Barbara tells the story of how her family was helpless in saving their father even though they visited him nearly every day. Nursing home staff minimized and explained away a sharp downturn in Mr. Salerno's condition. By the time he finally received medical attention; Mr. Salerno was in acute renal failure, had advanced pneumonia and was malnourished. He died a few days later.

Friday, March 4, 2011

Group Calls for Federal Probe into Florida's Firing of Nursing Home Advocate

A nursing home advocacy group is calling on the federal government to investigate Florida governor Rick Scott's recent removal of the director of the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. 

Every state is required to have an ombudsman program that serves as an independent voice for nursing home residents -- addressing resident complaints and advocating for improvements in the long-term care system. As ElderLawAnswers reported earlier, shortly after taking office, Gov. Scott ousted Brian Lee, who during his seven years directing Florida's ombudsman program had gained a reputation as a staunch advocate for the elderly. After Scott, a Republican, won the governorship last November, the Florida Assisted Living Association, an industry group, sent him a letter recommending an individual to replace Lee, one who would presumably be friendlier to their industry. 

Lee's removal has alarmed The National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, a leading advocate for long-term care residents nationwide. In a letter to the head of U.S. Administration on Aging, the Consumer Voice's Executive Director Sarah F. Wells charges that "Mr. Lee was forced to resign from office at the request and recommendation of nursing home and assisted living operators." Wells calls on the federal agency to "investigate the reasons for Lee's dismissal as potential willful interference and detrimental impact on the ability of the State Ombudsman to advocate on behalf of the long-term care residents of the state," and notes that willful interference with the ombudsman's job is illegal. 

ElderLawAnswers has obtained a copy of the letter that the Florida Assisted Living Association sent to Governor-elect Scott recommending an individual to replace Lee. To see the letter, click here. 

Some of the state's 17 councils of volunteer ombudsmen are considering legal action and/or filing a formal complaint with the U.S. Attorney General.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Currently on The Swinton Law Firm Radio: When to Use an Elder Law Attorney

My website, www.swintonlaw.com,  has a link to Elder Law Radio. The current show is summarized below.  You can listen online or download it for later.

I hope you find it informative.
,
The Swinton Law Firm Radio

When to Use an Elder Law Attorney
  Peter J. Strauss with Harry Margolis
 
Peter J. Strauss is co-director and founder of the Elder Law Clinic, which provides representation to persons for whom a guardianship is sought and serves as court evaluator in guardianship proceedings. He also teaches the Elder Law course. He has been an adjunct professor at New York Law School since 1992 and was named distinguished practitioner in residence in the fall semester 2003.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Avoid Disagreements Between Your General and Health Care Power of Attorney Agents

A general power of attorney and a health care power of attorney are two very important estate planning documents. Both allow other people to make decisions for you in the event you are incapacitated. Because the individuals chosen will have to coordinate your care, it is important to pick two people who will get along.

A general power of attorney allows a person you appoint -- your agent  -- to act in your place for financial purposes when and if you ever become incapacitated. A health care power of attorney is a document that gives an agent the authority to make health care decisions for you if you are unable to communicate such decisions.

While the health care agent is the one who makes the health care decisions, the person who holds the general power of attorney is the one who needs to pay for the health care. If the two agents disagree, it can spell trouble. For example, suppose your health care agent decides that you need 24-hour care at home, but your general power of attorney agent thinks a nursing home is the best option and refuses to pay for the at-home care. Any disagreements would have to be settled by a court, which will take time and drain your resources in the process.

The easiest way to avoid conflicts is to choose the same person to do both jobs. But this may not always be feasible -- for example, perhaps the person you would choose as health care agent is not good with finances. If you pick different people for both roles, then you should think about picking two people who can get along and work together. You should also talk to both agents about your wishes for medical care so that they both understand what you want.

If you have questions about whom to name for these roles, or you haven't yet executed these all-important documents, contact my office for help.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Nursing Home Residents Have Rights

Many people incorrectly believe that once someone enters a nursing home, their freedom is over. In fact, nursing home residents have many rights, and it is important to know those rights and to be able to enforce them.


Nursing home residents' rights are protected under federal law. In broad terms, nursing homes are required to ensure that every nursing home resident be given whatever services are necessary to function at the highest level possible. Following are some of the specific protections that residents have:

• Nursing home residents have the right to privacy in all aspects of their care. This means phone calls and mail should be private, and residents should be able to close doors and windows. In addition, residents may bring belongings from home, and nursing home staff is required to assist the residents in protecting those belongings.

• Residents have the right to go to bed and to get up when they choose, eat a variety of snacks outside meal times, decide what to wear, choose activities, and decide how to spend their time. The nursing home must offer a choice at main meals, because individual tastes and needs vary.

• Residents have the right to leave the nursing home and belong to any church or social group they wish to.

• Residents must be allowed to participate in planning their care. Residents may also manage their own financial affairs.

• Residents may not be moved to a different room, a different nursing home, a hospital, back home or anywhere else without advance notice and an opportunity for appeal. For more information on fighting a nursing home discharge, click here. click here

For a full list of nursing home resident rights, click here

If a disagreement with the nursing home does arise, there are a number of steps you can take to enforce the resident's rights. The first step would be to talk to the nursing home staff directly. This may be all it takes to solve the problem. If that doesn't work, then you may need to talk to a supervisor or administrator. The next step is to contact the ombudsperson assigned to the nursing home. He or she should be able to intervene and get an appropriate result. Contact information for the Ombudsman Program in your state can be found at: www.ltcombudsman.org/ombudsman. Additional steps include reporting the nursing home to the licensing agency and hiring a geriatric care manager to intervene. If the direct approach isn't working, you may need to hire a lawyer to try and resolve the issues. The last resort is to move the resident to a different facility.

For more information on resolving nursing home disputes, click here.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Health Care Power of Attorneys

The Health Care Power of Attorney

If an individual becomes incapacitated, it is important that someone have the legal authority to communicate that person's wishes concerning medical treatment. A health care power of attorney allows an individual to appoint someone else to act as their agent for medical, as opposed to financial, decisions. The health care power of attorney is a document executed by a competent person (the principal) giving another person (the agent) the authority to make health care decisions for the principal if he or she is unable to communicate such decisions. By executing a health care power of attorney, principals ensure that the instructions that they have given their agent will be carried out. A health care power of attorney is especially important to have if an individual and family members may disagree about treatment.

In general, a health care power of attorney takes effect only when the principal requires medical treatment and a physician determines that the principal is unable to communicate his or her wishes concerning treatment. How this works exactly can depend on the laws of the particular state and the terms of the health care power of attorney itself. If the principal later becomes able to express his or her own wishes, he or she will be listened to and the health care power of attorney will have no effect.

Appointing an Agent

Since the agent will have the authority to make medical decisions in the event the principal is unable to, the agent should be a family member or friend that the principal trusts to follow his or her instructions. Before executing a health care power of attorney, the principal should talk to the person whom he or she wants to name as the agent about the principal's wishes concerning medical decisions, especially life-sustaining treatment.

Once the health care power of attorney is drawn up, the agent should keep the original document. The principal should have a copy and the principal's physician should keep a copy with that individual's medical records.

Those interested in drawing up a health care power of attorney document should contact an attorney who is skilled and experienced in estate planning and elder law matters. Many hospitals and nursing homes also provide forms, as do some public agencies.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Living Wills: What are they? What do they do?

Living wills are documents that give instructions regarding treatment if the individual becomes terminally ill or is in a persistent vegetative state and is unable to communicate his or her own instructions. The living will states under what conditions life-sustaining treatment should be terminated. If an individual would like to avoid life-sustaining treatment when it would be hopeless, he or she needs to draw up a living will. Like a health care proxy, a living will takes effect only upon a person's incapacity. Also, a living will is not set in stone; an individual can always revoke it at a later date if he or she wishes to do so.

A living will, however, is not necessarily a substitute for a health care proxy or broader medical directive. It simply dictates the withdrawal of life support in instances of terminal illness, coma or a vegetative state.

Also, do not confuse a living will with a "do not resuscitate" order (DNR). A DNR says that if you are having a medical emergency such as a heart attack or stroke, medical professionals may not try to revive you. This is very different from a living will, which only goes into effect if you are in a vegetative state. Everyone can benefit from a living will while DNRs are only for very elderly and/or frail patients for whom it wouldn't make sense to administer CPR.

For more information on end-of-life decision-making from the Mayo Clinic, click here.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Revocable Living Trusts

A trust is a contract between the Grantor (the person who creates the trust), the Trustee (one who controls the trust) and the beneficiaries (those entitled to benefit from the trust). You, as Grantor, determine how the trust will be operated by the Trustee and who benefits, how and when. You can create a trust that permits you to be Trustee and give you the right to receive full benefits from it. This type of trust is typically referred to as a Revocable Living Trust and is often used as a substitute to your Will. It permits you to keep total control and access to all your assets during your life, and provides for the distribution of your assets to your beneficiaries at your death. We often refer to a revocable living trust as your ABook of Instructions. A well established advantage to Revocable Living Trusts is the avoidance of probate, which is required if you use a will to distribute your assets after death. Other advantages of Revocable Trusts, when property drafted, can include:

• Asset protection for your spouse after your death.

• Special needs planning for disabled beneficiaries.

• Asset management and protection for children who are not proficient with handling money.

• Protection of assets from a spouse=s subsequent marriage after your death.

• Disability planning in case you become disabled prior to death.

• Asset protection for your children if in bad marriages or to ensure your assets don’t go to the in-laws.

• Keeping your affairs private (as opposed to open for public review in probate).

• No court intervention required (handled entirely by Trustee you name in accordance with your detailed instructions).

• Plan for proper management of your business in your absence.

Very few revocable living trusts provide these benefits. Only a qualified estate planning attorney will know how to incorporate these protections into your plan. While a Revocable Living Trust has many advantages, it does not protect your assets from a nursing home, lawsuits, divorce bankruptcy or other creditors.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

What is Probate?

It is the legal process of presenting your Will to the Court, after your death to authenticate it, and appoint your Executor. Your Executor must be appointed by the Court in order to collect and distribute your assets as stated in your Will. However, because it is a legal process, there are many steps that must be followed before your Executor can be appointed.


• The attorneys must obtain signatures from your heirs signifying they agree the Will is yours, and they will not contest it. Your heirs are your spouse and children and all must agree not to contest your Will before your Executor can be appointed. If you don't have a spouse or child, probate becomes even more complicated. Even if your heir is not a beneficiary, his waiver is still required. This can be very different in second-marriage situations, if you have minor children or if you have a child you lost contact with. If a child dies before you, then, all of your deceased child’s children will have to agree not to contest your Will, but if they are under 18, the Court will need to appoint a separate attorney to represent them. The same is true if any of your heirs are legally incapacitated, such as a retarded child or spouse with Alzheimers.

• The Executor will have to submit a family tree, filing fees, a petition, a death certificate and affidavits from the individuals who witnessed your Will. Upon receipt of all of the appropriate information (if no heirs contest it), the Court will appoint the Executor.

• After your Executor is appointed, estate administration begins. It is a period of time the law permits the Executor to accumulate the assets and report to the Court how he/she intends to distribute them. This period is a minimum of seven months after the Executor is appointed. However, in most cases, it takes a year or more. If you die without a will, the process is similar, but the State decides who gets your assets, not you.

• Unfortunately, probate is unpredictable. That's why many people chose to avoid it, but if all of your heirs agree and your assets are centralized, it can go smoothly.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Who Needs Estate Planning?

Estate planning isn’t about how much money you have, it's about protecting what you have for you, during your life and for those you love, after you’re gone. It ensures what you have gets to the people you love, the way you want, when you want.

If you were to die today, are you comfortable everything will be taken care of the way you wanted? Estate planning is legally ensuring things will be handled the way you want by providing sufficient instructions.

Estate Planning really is for everyone. It doesn’t matter if you have $40,000 or $400,000. You still have to plan for the future. Whether it’s to name a guardian for your minor children or ensure your children don’t blow through your assets if you unexpectedly die or become disabled (Terri Schiavo case).

Estate planning can only be done by attorneys, and it can be as simple as a Will, Health Care Proxy, Living Will and Power of Attorney. It can also include a revocable, probate-avoidance trust, asset protection trusts, multi-generational tax-saving trusts, tax-saving charitable trusts, private family foundations, and many other fact-specific strategies.


Keeping your Estate Plan Current...

Once completed, your estate plan should be reviewed and kept current with life events such as birth, death, marriage or divorce of anyone included in your plan. In addition, you should review your plan if there is a significant increase or decrease in your finances or if the laws related to your estate plan change.

Monday, July 27, 2009

I have a will, so why do I need an Estate Plan?

Many people mistakenly think that estate planning only involves the writing of a will. Estate planning, however, can also involve financial, tax, medical and business planning. A will is part of the planning process, but you will need other documents as well to fully address your estate planning needs.

Who needs estate planning?
You do—whether your estate is large or small. Either way, you should designate someone to manage your assets and make health care and personal care decisions for you if you ever become unable to do so for yourself.

If your estate is small, you may simply focus on who will receive your assets after your death, and who should manage your estate, pay your last debts and handle the distribution of your assets.

If your estate is large, your attorney will also discuss various ways of preserving your assets for your beneficiaries and of reducing or postponing the amount of estate tax which otherwise might be payable after your death.

If you fail to plan ahead, a judge may be needed to appoint someone to handle your assets and personal care. Your assets then will be distributed to your heirs according to a set of rules known as intestate succession.

Contrary to popular myth, everything does not automatically go to the state if you die without a will. Your relatives, no matter how remote, and, in some cases, the relatives of your spouse will have priority in inheritance ahead of the state.
Still, they may not be your choice of heirs; an estate plan gives you much greater control over who will inherit your assets after your death.

What is included in my estate?
Everything you own is included in your estate. This could include assets held in your name alone or jointly with others, assets such as bank accounts, real estate, stocks and bonds, and furniture, cars and jewelry.

Your assets may also include life insurance proceeds, retirement accounts and payments that are due to you (such as a tax refund, outstanding loan or inheritance).
The value of your estate is equal to the “fair market value” of all of your various types of property—after you have deducted your debts (your car loan, for example, and any mortgage on your home.)

The value of your estate is important in determining whether your estate will be subject to inheritance taxes or estate taxes after your death and whether your beneficiaries could later be subject to capital gains taxes. Ensuring that there will be sufficient resources to pay such taxes is another important part of the estate planning process.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

10 Good Reasons to have an Estate Plan

No matter your net worth, it's important to have a basic estate plan in place.
An estate plan ensures that your family and financial goals are met after you die. It is a process. It involves people—your family, other individuals and, in some cases, charitable organizations of your choice. It also involves your assets (your property) and the various forms of ownership and title that those assets may take. Overall, it addresses your future needs in case you ever become unable to care for yourself. It is not only for the elderly – even young people are faced with unfortunate circumstances: health related, automobile accidents and so forth.

An estate plan has several elements and considerations.

1)A General Power of attorney or Living Trust can determine:
a)How and by whom your assets will be managed for your benefit during your lifetime if you ever become unable to manage them yourself.
b)When and under what circumstances it makes sense to distribute your assets during your lifetime.

2)A Will or Living Trust can determine:
a)How and to whom your assets will be distributed after your death.

3)A Living Will or Health Care Power of Attorney can determine how and by whom your personal care will be managed and how health care decisions will be made during your lifetime if you become unable to care for yourself.

4)For some, the establishment of a Trust may also be suitable.

What is involved in estate planning?
Taking inventory of your assets is a good place to start.
Your assets include your investments, retirement savings, insurance policies, and real estate or business interests. A good place to start is to ask yourself the following questions:
1)What are my assets and what is their approximate value?
2)Whom do I want to receive those assets—and when?
3)Who should manage those assets if I cannot—either during my lifetime or after my death?
4)Who should be responsible for taking care of my minor children if I become unable to care for them myself?
5)Who should make decisions on my behalf concerning my care and welfare if I become unable to care for myself?
6)What do I want done with my remains after I die and where would I want them buried, scattered or otherwise laid to rest?

Once you have some answers to these questions, our office can help you create an estate plan, and advise you on such issues as taxes, title to assets and the management of your estate.

Everybody needs a will.
A will tells the world exactly where you want your assets distributed when you die. It's also the best place to name guardians for your children. Dying without a will - also known as dying "intestate" - can be costly to your heirs and leaves you no say over who gets your assets. Even if you have a trust, you still need a will to take care of any holdings outside of that trust when you die.

Trusts are not only for wealthy people.
Trusts are legal mechanisms that let you put conditions on how and when your assets will be distributed upon your death. They also allow you to reduce your estate and gift taxes and to distribute assets to your heirs with less cost, delay and publicity. Some also offer greater protection of your assets from creditors and lawsuits.

Don’t I only have to discuss my estate plans with my family (heirs) to prevent disputes or confusion?
That would be nice, but upon death emotions rise and there are often hard feelings among those you loved. Inheritance can be a loaded issue and at times full of mixed emotions and even greed. By being clear about your intentions with your loved ones, you may help dispel potential conflicts after you're gone, however, there may be issues you do not wish to speak of. Discussing your true wishes in confidence with your attorney can help provide you with peace of mind.

The federal estate tax exemption
The amount you may leave to heirs free of federal tax - has hit $3.5 million in 2009.
The estate tax is scheduled to phase out completely by 2010, but only for a year. Unless Congress passes new laws between now and then, the tax will be reinstated in 2011 and you will only be allowed to leave your heirs $1 million tax-free at that time.

You may leave an unlimited amount of money to your spouse tax-free, but this isn't always the best tactic.
By leaving all your assets to your spouse, you don't use your estate tax exemption and instead increase your surviving spouse's taxable estate. That means your children are likely to pay more in estate taxes if your spouse leaves them the money when he or she dies. Plus, it defers the tough decisions about the distribution of your assets until your spouse's death.

There are two easy ways to give gifts tax-free and reduce your estate.
You may give up to $13,000 a year to an individual (or $26,000 if you're married and giving the gift with your spouse). You may also pay an unlimited amount of medical and education bills for someone if you pay the expenses directly to the institutions where they were incurred.

There are ways to give charitable gifts that keep on giving.
If you donate to a charitable gift fund or community foundation, your investment grows tax-free and you can select the charities to which contributions are given both before and after you die.